“ Islamic art is abstract, but also poetical and gracious; it is woven of
soberness and splendour .... uniting
the joyous profusion of vegetation with the abstract and pure vigour of crystals:
a prayer niche adorned with arabesques holds something of a garden and something
of a snowflake. This admixture of qualtities is already to be met with in
the Qoran where the geometry of the ideas is as it were hidden under the
the blaze of the forms. Being, if one can so put it, haunted by Unity, Islam
has also an aspect of the simplicity of the desert, of whiteness and of austerity
which, in its art, alternates with the crystalline joy of ornamentation.”
Frithjof Schuon, (1969)
|
section 8
Berber Tribes
In
our website we have followed the convention of grouping the textiles by tribe.
But we are mindful that this word and this means of social organisation have
connotations in the West which might colour people's views of these textiles.
We are told that Berber tribes are segmentary:
“By this is meant a principle of
symmetry in which a Berber ‘tribe’ splits into sub-groups, which are in turn
divided into further sub-groups, down to the very small faction of the agnatic
nuclear family. All that effectively defines any such tribe as an actual
social unit is the belief in a common ancestor, whatever the actual genetic
reality might be. Indeed, many segmentary tribes derive from more heterogenous
groups or clans, whose union is based on the fact that they simply occupy
the same piece of territory. Thus the idea of a tribe is a very fluid one,
and a ‘tribal’ name may in fact apply to anything from a group of two or
three clans to a huge group occupying a vast territory.”
Brett & Fentress (7)
This ought to help explain why it proves so difficult to attribute a rug
to a particular tribe. The literature abounds with equivocal attributions
and our western notions of a tribe as being somehow static and self-defining
are challenged. Are tribal rugs really tribal? To what extent does intermarriage
help explain the mixing of tribal styles? How far will a weaver go in borrowing
and exploiting the design vocabulary of another tribe? Is their work sometimes as plagiaristic
and referential as western art?
Conclusion
Look at the kilims and make up your own mind - these web pages and their
pictures may help but you need to see the textiles wherever you can rather
than their pictures.
Is this the work of women wishing to exploit a commercial opportunity?
Are they merely rehashing the geometries of their ancestors and some tribal and pastoral history?
Are these God-fearing women using decoration as a medium for contemplation of the divine attributes?
The chances are that you will be able to find in Moroccan kilims evidence
of all of these traits of their makers. Some kilims are made in workshops
with much more emphasis upon the value of commerce and wages than upon the
religious views of the owner and the employee. Other kilims are truely unique
and draw their inspiration from a tribal history and a most pure, monotheistic
tradition.
Our contention is only that, at their very best, these textiles are very
good Islamic art and that in order to appreciate this, the western eye needs
to remove any sense of condescension for the religion or the society.We have argued that the anomalies found in many designs, might give some clue as to the weaver's artistic intentions and also the circumstances in which the textile was made.
But if we have been critical of the West and the Oriental rug market for
sometimes misrepresenting the art of muslims, we are also in no doubt that
the muslim world is indebted to this market for preserving and nourishing
this textile tradition.
We wonder how the market might further develop should western muslims become
significant patrons of this tradition? What if just a fraction of those muslims
who regularly pray upon cheap, factory produced prayer rugs, should instead
buy a hand made kilim?< previous
we would like to hear your views;
click here to comment
|